The authorities nowadays strongly condemned a BBC collection on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the 2002 Gujarat riots as a “propaganda piece designed to push a discredited narrative” that should not be “dignified” with a response.
“Do word that this has now no longer been screened in India. So, I am simplest going to remark withinside the context of what I even have heard approximately it and what my colleagues have seen. Let me simply make it very clean that we assume that is a propaganda piece designed to push a selected discredited narrative. The bias, the shortage of objectivity, and admittedly a persevering with colonial mindset, is blatantly visible,” stated overseas ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi.
“If anything, this movie or documentary is a mirrored image at the corporation and people which might be peddling this narrative again. It makes us marvel approximately the cause of this workout and the schedule in the back of it and admittedly we do now no longer want to dignify such efforts,” he stressed.
The BBC’s two-component collection called “India: The Modi Question” has provoked sharp reactions. The collection descriptor calls it a “have a take a observe tensions among Indian PM Narendra Modi and India’s Muslim minority, investigating claims approximately his function withinside the 2002 riots that left over one thousand lifeless.”
UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, responding to a Pakistan-starting place MP’s query withinside the British parliament at the collection, stated he “would not consider the characterization” of PM Modi.
“The UK authorities’s function in this has been clean and long-status and hasn’t changed, of course, we do not tolerate persecution in which it seems everywhere however I am now no longer positive I agree in any respect with the characterisation that the honourable gentleman has recommend to,” Mr Sunak stated, snubbing Imran Hussain.
A Supreme Court-appointed probe observed no proof of any wrongdoing through PM Modi, who changed into Chief Minister of Gujarat while the riots broke out in February 2002. The Special Investigation Team, in a record a decade after the riots, exonerated PM Modi citing “no prosecutable proof”. In June remaining year, the Supreme Court sponsored the clearance to PM Modi and stated the case changed into “with out merits” and changed into filed “obviously, for ulterior design”.
In 2013, while a neighborhood courtroom docket cleared him of any function in one in all the most important massacres for the duration of the riots, PM Modi stated in a post: “Satyameva Jayate (the reality prevails)”.
The BBC says the collection examines how “Narendra Modi’s premiership has been dogged through continual allegations approximately the mindset of his authorities toward India’s Muslim population” and “a sequence of debatable policies” carried out through PM Modi after his re-election in 2019, including “the elimination of Kashmir’s unique popularity assured beneathneath Article 370” and “a citizenship regulation that many stated handled Muslims unfairly”, which “has been observed through reviews of violent assaults on Muslims through Hindus.”
Lord Rami Ranger, a member of the United Kingdom House of Lords, changed into amongst folks that accused the BBC of biased reporting.
“@BBCNews You have precipitated a incredible deal of harm to over 1000000000 Indians. It insults a democratically elected@PMOIndia Indian Police and the Indian judiciary. We condemn the riots and lack of lifestyles and additionally condemn your biased reporting,” he tweeted.
Many Indian starting place Twitter customers scoffed and stated the BBC must run a sequence at the 1943 Bengal famine, which left a few 3 million humans lifeless or demise of malnutrition or disease. The BBC, stated a tweet, must run a sequence at the Bengal Famine called “UK: The Churchill Question.” Then UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill, as a part of the western conflict effort, ordered the diversion of meals from ravenous Indians to already well-provided British squaddies and stockpiles in Britain and Europe.