EY foreign envoy to Sri Lanka and groups of rights -the rights have expressed concern over the decision of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to express an emergency for the second time in about 5 months, afraid that the security forces might use great power of the peaceful protectiveness in the middle of the crisis The worst economy of the country in the country that was the worst in the country in the country that was the worst of the country in the country in the country that was the worst in that country in the country’s worst in the country In that country the worst in the country the worst in the country in the country the country gained the country the worst in the country the worst in the country gained the worst country in the country which was the worst in the country. The country gained the worst country in the country which was the worst in the country I TU in that country gained the worst country in the country to get the country in the worst country in the country in that country to get the country to get the worst country in the country in the country.
However, India has not issued any statements and coordinates with the Rajapaksa government to provide humanitarian assistance to the country, ET has learned.
The US Ambassador to Lanka, Julie Chung, tweeted on Saturday that she was “concerned”, added that “the voices of peaceful citizens need to be heard”.
Canadian High Commissioner David McKinnon said Lankan residents had the right to protest peace and that “it is difficult to understand why it is necessary, to express an emergency”.
The European Union says that the regulations “can have a counter-productive effect” and note that a month of anti-government protest so far peaceful.
Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission said he was very concerned about emergency announcements. “We urge the government to explain to the public the reason for this proclamation is because the protest is mostly peaceful and in the ambition of normal police operations,” he said in a statement.